{"id":50,"date":"2017-09-04T06:08:20","date_gmt":"2017-09-04T06:08:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/?page_id=50"},"modified":"2020-12-29T07:58:23","modified_gmt":"2020-12-29T07:58:23","slug":"logical-fallacies","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/logical-fallacies\/","title":{"rendered":"Logical Fallacies"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"twelve columns\" style=\"margin-top: 10%;\">\n<div class=\"advance\"><a class=\"button button-primary\" href=\"http:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/types-of-evidence-opinion-v-fact-authorial-bias\">\u2b05 Previous Lesson<\/a>\u00a0<a class=\"button\" href=\"http:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/interpretation-of-expository-texts\">Workshop Index<\/a>\u00a0<a class=\"button button-primary\" href=\"http:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/further-reading-on-expository-text\">Next Lesson \u27a1<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- CONTENT BEGINS HERE --><\/p>\n<h1 id=\"title\">Logical Fallacies<\/h1>\n<h4>Objective<\/h4>\n<p>Review some of the most important logical fallcies to understand how they can be used to manipulate\u00a0arguments.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n\n<h4> Previously Covered:<\/h4>\n\n\n--><\/p>\n<p><strong><abbr title=\"The branch of thought concerned with valid argumentation; that is, the demonstration of a conclusion from a given premise, using the processes of induction and deduction.\">Logic<\/abbr><\/strong> is the study of <strong><abbr title=\"The process of presenting a premise and using logical reasoning to support a conclusion that arises from that premise\">argumentation<\/abbr><\/strong>. The purpose of an argument is to prove the validity of a <strong><abbr title=\"1. The main point of an argument; the fact or idea whose truth the argument seeks to establish. 2. Rhetoric: as statement or proposition that is inferred from the premise of an argument and supported through the process of logical reasoning in the argument\u2019s body.\">conclusion<\/abbr><\/strong>, which in turn is based on the author\u2019s <strong><abbr title=\"A statement offered in an argument in support of the argument\u2019s conclusion.\">premise<\/abbr><\/strong>. An argument is valid if it follows the rules of inference, which govern the proper means of <strong><abbr title=\"Making an educated guess based on available evidence or one's own background knowledge\">inferring<\/abbr><\/strong> a conclusion from a\u00a0given premise.<\/p>\n<p>To determine the validity of an argument, the reader must examine whether the author\u2019s claims and\u00a0assertions have a logical relationship to his or her premise and whether those claims, in turn, imply\u00a0the conclusion. An argument is invalid if the conclusion cannot be inferred from the given premise. When\u00a0a logical argument includes an error in reasoning, the argument is defined as invalid, or fallacious.\u00a0(The term <i>\u201cnon sequitur\u201d<\/i> defines an argument whose conclusion does not follow from the premise\u00a0and thus encompasses all kinds of fallacies.)<\/p>\n<p><strong><abbr title=\"An argument that violates the rules of logical demonstration (faulty evidence, flawed induction, or deduction) and is therefore invalid\">Fallacy<\/abbr><\/strong> describes the structure of an argument rather than the truth of its components. An author\u2019s premise and\u00a0conclusion may both be true while the argument itself is still fallacious. Invalid arguments tend to\u00a0follow patterns of faulty reasoning, which are defined as <abbr title=\"Logical fallacies are almost always the result of faulty evidence or flawed reasoning. The claims and assertions contained in the body of the argument provide the evidence that proves the argument\u2019s premise and supports its conclusion. The evidence must pertain to the premise as stated. It must be presented clearly. If a source is cited, the book, magazine, or author should be a reputable authority on the topic under discussion. In addition, those claims and assertions must follow logically from the premise and lead logically to the conclusion. Inductive reasoning should move from a defined set of particular instances to arrive at a general conclusion, while deductive reasoning begins with a general conclusion , from which follows a conclusion about particulars. Either type of reasoning is flawed when extraneous elements are introduced, such as appeals to the reader\u2019s emotions, personal attacks on the author\u2019s opponent, or value judgments that are unsupported by objective evidence.\"> logical fallacies<\/abbr>.<\/p>\n<p><!-- --><\/p>\n<section>The Flash segment below illustrates some common fallacies. Click the screen below to begin.<object class=\"old_animation\" id=\"flashPlayer\" width=\"750\" height=\"450\" classid=\"clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000\" codebase=\"http:\/\/fpdownload.macromedia.com\/pub\/shockwave\/ca= bs\/flash\/swflash.cab#version=6,0,0,0\" align=\"middle\"><param name=\"allowScriptAccess\" value=\"sameDomain\" \/><param name=\"movie\" value=\"flashplayer.swf?sURL=Logical.swf\" \/><param name=\"quality\" value=\"high\" \/><param name=\"bgcolor\" value=\"#ffffff\" \/><embed src=\"http:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/Images\/english\/flash\/flashplayer.swf?sURL=http:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/Images\/english\/flash\/Logical.swf\" quality=\"high\" class=\"padding center\" style=\"width: 100%;\" name=\"flashPlayer\" allowscriptaccess=\"sameDomain\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" pluginspage=\"http:\/\/www.macromedia.com\/go\/getflashplayer\" height=\"450\" \/><\/object><\/p>\n<div class=\"slider-container new_animation\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/animation_sliders\/fallacies\/fallacies.html\" referrerpolicy=\"origin\" width=\"750\" height=\"450\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><br \/>\n<\/iframe>\n<\/div>\n<p>The following table categorizes the most common logical fallacies according to whether the error in\u00a0reasoning occurs in the author\u2019s assertions (evidence) or actual logic (<strong><abbr title=\"Observing a limited number of cases to reach a general conclusion\">induction<\/abbr> <\/strong>or\u00a0<strong><abbr>deduction<\/abbr><\/strong>).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<table class=\"lesson_text\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"10\" align=\"center\">\n<tbody>\n<tr bgcolor=\"#003366\">\n<td colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"583\">\n<p class=\"white_lesson_header\" align=\"center\"><strong><br \/>\nFallacies of Evidence<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"133\">Appeal to authority<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"450\">Relies on an authoritative source to provide evidence in an\u00a0area outside his or her area of expertise. Example: \u201cThe superiority of the Gothic novel to\u00a0the morality play is made evident by the catalog of Abraham Lincoln\u2019s library, which\u00a0included first editions of every contemporary example of the genre.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"133\">Red herring<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"450\">Presents a misleading argument in order to distract attention\u00a0from the real point being argued. \u201cExample: In judging the extent of Ezra Pound\u2019s influence\u00a0on the modern writers, it is important to remember that Pound was personally responsible for\u00a0bringing the beautiful simplicity of Japanese art and literature to the attention of the\u00a0West.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"133\">Self-contradiction<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"450\">Presents evidence that supports contradictory premises or that\u00a0contradicts itself. Example: \u201cFrancis Bacon must have been the real author of Shakespeare\u2019s\u00a0work. Shakespeare\u2019s existence can be proved from historical data; moreover, the style and\u00a0vocabulary of Shakespeare\u2019s tragedies follows a pattern found nowhere in Bacon\u2019s other\u00a0works.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"133\">Confusion of fact and opinion<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"450\">Mistakes a value judgment as objective fact. Example: \u201cBecause\u00a0female poets are more sensitive to the painful consequences of human relationships, their\u00a0work tends to focus on topics of personal significance.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"133\">Equivocation<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"450\">Uses a word or term according to its multiple definitions while\u00a0assuming that the word means the same in each context. Example: \u201cAccording to the nihilists,\u00a0who believed in nothing, nothing is worse than the false assumption that life has meaning.\u00a0Therefore, the nihilists held the contradictory belief that nothing was both a good and a\u00a0bad thing.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<hr \/>\n<table class=\"lesson_text\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"10\" align=\"center\">\n<tbody>\n<tr bgcolor=\"#003366\">\n<td colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"583\">\n<p align=\"center\"><strong class=\"white_lesson_header\">Fallacies of Induction<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"133\"><span class=\"lesson_objective\">Argumentum ad hominem<\/span><span class=\"style3\"><i><br \/>\n<\/i><\/span>(personal attack)<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"450\">Makes the faulty general conclusion that a person\u2019s claims are\u00a0false because there is something objectionable about the person. Example: \u201c Hitler\u2019s claims\u00a0that Germany suffered under the terms of reparation are contradicted by his blatant\u00a0anti-Semitism.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"133\">Straw man<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"450\">Assumes that disproving one theory or idea as false also\u00a0disproves a related theory. Example: \u201c The Platonic ideal is a clumsy, unworkable concept.\u00a0Plato\u2019s <i>Republic<\/i> can therefore be disregarded in terms of its value to societies\u00a0interested in building a just form of government. \u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"133\">False analogy<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"450\">Assumes that because two events or conditions are partially\u00a0similar, they must be similar in other (or all) respects. Example: \u201c Writing a novel is like\u00a0farming. The crop must be changed periodically or the earth dries up and turns to dust.\u00a0Therefore, the novelist who fails to change his subject matter or take a new perspective\u00a0loses all freshness and creativity.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"133\">False dilemma<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"450\">Concludes from the presentation of two opposing points of view\u00a0that no alternatives are available and one of the given options must be true. Example:\u00a0\u201cEither Ezra Pound was a fascist and a traitor, or he temporarily lost his mind. Because he\u00a0claimed after the war to still love his country, he must have been insane.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"133\">Slippery slope<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"450\">Infers that the existence of one event or condition inevitably\u00a0leads to another. Example: If we don\u2019t do something about the cost of gasoline now, before\u00a0you know it we\u2019ll be paying five dollars a gallon.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr bgcolor=\"#003366\">\n<td colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"583\">\n<p class=\"white_lesson_header\" align=\"center\"><strong><br \/>\nFallacies of Deduction<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"133\"><span class=\"lesson_objective\"> Argumentum ad populum<\/span><br \/>\n(appeal to the majority) or bandwagon<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"450\">From the general premise that a given belief is widely held,\u00a0concludes that it must be true. Example: \u201c Most scholars agree that at the age of nineteen\u00a0Mary Shelley lacked the intellectual maturity to write a novel like <i>Frankenstein,\u00a0<\/i>which must therefore have been written by her poet husband.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"133\"><span class=\"lesson_objective\">Argumentum ad consequentiam <\/span>(appeal to consequences)<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"450\">Supports a particular conclusion because of the consequences\u00a0that such a claim or belief would entail. Example: \u201cIf Percy Bysshe Shelley wrote <i>Frankenstein,\u00a0<\/i>the canon of female horror writers would shrink significantly. Therefore it is vital to\u00a0assert that Mary Shelley was the novel\u2019s true author.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"133\">Begging the question<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"450\">The premise of an argument assumes the truth of its conclusion.\u00a0Example: \u201cEmily Dickinson\u2019s poetry is marvelous in its simplicity. Therefore, Dickinson can\u00a0be called a master of the simple poem.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<hr \/>\n<\/section>\n<p><!-- CONTENT ENDS HERE --><\/p>\n<div class=\"advance\"><a class=\"button button-primary\" href=\"http:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/types-of-evidence-opinion-v-fact-authorial-bias\">\u2b05 Previous Lesson<\/a>\u00a0<a class=\"button\" href=\"http:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/interpretation-of-expository-texts\">Workshop Index<\/a>\u00a0<a class=\"button button-primary\" href=\"http:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/further-reading-on-expository-text\">Next Lesson \u27a1<\/a><\/div>\n<p><a class=\"backtotop\" href=\"#title\">Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u2b05 Previous Lesson\u00a0Workshop Index\u00a0Next Lesson \u27a1 Logical Fallacies Objective Review some of the most important logical fallcies to understand how they can be used to manipulate\u00a0arguments. Logic is the study of argumentation. The purpose of an argument is to prove the validity of a conclusion, which in turn is based on the author\u2019s premise. An [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-50","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/50","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/50\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":683,"href":"https:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/50\/revisions\/683"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanboard.org\/Subjects\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}